Frederic Gillion and members of the Fenwick Elliott team, including Tom Young and Rebecca Saunders, have written a number of articles on the FIDIC form of contract for the Practical Law Website (www.practicallaw.com [1]). Here, in one of these articles, Tom Young considers the definition of “cost” in the current suite of FIDIC forms of contract and reviews the circumstances where “cost” might be recovered.
The definition of “cost” in the current suite of FIDIC contracts is the same in every contract. The definition provides that:
“‘Cost’ means all expenditure reasonably incurred (or to be incurred) by the Contractor, whether on or off the Site, including overhead and similar charges, but does not include profit.”
The definition of cost in the current suite of FIDIC contracts has remained relatively unchanged since the publishing of the fourth edition of the Red Book in 1987, which was the first time the definition expressly excluded profit. The fourth edition provides that:
“‘cost’ means all expenditure properly incurred or to be incurred, whether on or off the Site, including overhead and other charges properly allocable thereto but does not include any allowance for profit.”
The differences between the definition in the fourth edition of the Red Book and the current suite of contracts are minimal, but include:
The final step towards the definition in the current suite occurred when FIDIC published the new Orange Book in 1995, in which the only difference was that expenditure must be “properly incurred” rather than “reasonably incurred”.
In the current suite of FIDIC contracts the features of the definition of cost are that:
Whilst the definition does expressly refer to financing charges, the FIDIC Guide first edition 2000 explains that overhead charges may include reasonable financing costs incurred by reason of payment being received after expenditure. The FIDIC Guide also notes that in some countries financing costs might be included within cost, even though funds were not borrowed because the contractor had sufficient funds at his disposal.
Exclusion of profit One of the main features of the definition of “cost” is that it does not automatically include any element of profit. In order to ascertain whether an element of profit is recoverable one needs to look at the actual wording of the individual sub-clauses. In general terms, and as noted by the FIDIC Guide, an element of profit is recoverable in addition to cost where the employer is blameworthy. Where neither party is at fault then it is usually only cost that is recoverable. The current suite of FIDIC contracts use slightly different wording where it is stated that profit is recoverable in addition to cost: In the event that the parties to a contract using the Red Book, Yellow Book or Silver Book wish to specify the amount of profit recoverable, the FIDIC Guide recommends that the following amendment can be included at sub-clause 1.2: “In these Conditions, provisions including the expression ‘Cost plus reasonable profit’ require this profit to be [one-twentieth (5%)] of this Cost.” The circumstances in which the contractor is able to recover cost varies between the different forms in the current suite of contracts to reflect the different allocation of risks. By way of example, under the Red Book the contractor is able to recover cost for unforeseen ground conditions, whereas under the Silver Book unforeseen ground conditions is a risk assumed by the contractor and as such cost is not recoverable. Under the Red Book cost is recoverable under the following provisions: As the definition excludes profit, in each of the above circumstances there is the potential for the contractor to incur significant expenses without profit. The contractor’s entitlement to cost is subject to the strict notice provisions of sub-clause 20.1 of the FIDIC forms. Sub-clause 20.1 sets out the procedure that the contractor must follow in order to claim additional payment. Under sub-clause 20.1 the contractor must give notice of the event or circumstances giving rise to its claim as soon as practicable, and not later than 28 days after the contractor became aware, or should have become aware, of the event or circumstances. In the event the contractor fails to comply with the notice requirements set out at sub-clause 20.1, the contractor shall not be entitled to any additional payment. Back to the previous page [2] | Next article [3]
When is cost recoverable?
Recoverability of cost is subject to clause 20.1