Coventry & Warwickshire Development Partnership LLP v Avison Young (UK) Ltd
How will the court decide whether or not an adjudicator’s reasons are sufficient?
Dispatch
Dispatch highlights some of the most important legal developments during the last month relating to the building, engineering and energy sectors.
Sectors
Services
Regions
Contracts
Entexol Ltd v Sked Construction Ltd
Had the adjudicator gone off on a frolic of their own in deciding that time was at large?
3173 Bidco Ltd & Anor v Roberts & Anor
Could one party claim the costs of an unsuccessful Early Neutral Evaluation?
TTSJV WLL & Ors v BapCo Refining BSC
What is the correct legal test for challenging a call made against a bond?
Netomnia Ltd v MJ Quinn Integrated Services Ltd
Did the payment notice comply with the necessary statutory and contractual requirements? If it did not, what was the consequence?
Oakland Wantage Care Home Ltd v Stepnell Ltd
Was the alleged final account document a draft, or the real thing?
Deerns UK Ltd v VDC LHR11 Ltd
Did the contract provide for a final date for payment? And if it did not, what was the consequence?
Clerkenwell Lifestyle (UK) Ltd v HG Construction Ltd
Had the parties agreed an extension of time which the adjudicator failed to take account of?
Premier Modular Ltd v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
Had the adjudicator departed from the parties’ submissions and/or decided the dispute on a basis which they did not have an adequate opportunity to deal with?
RBH Building Contracts Ltd v James & Anor
How will the court determine whether a person “intends to occupy” the property: a key part of the test as to the whether or not the residential occupier exemption will apply to an adjudication?
RBH Building Contracts Ltd v James & Anor
What is the test the court will apply in determining whether or not the contents of a withholding notice comply with the requirements of the Housing Grants Act?
GMC Utilities Group Ltd v Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd
Did a letter form a binding agreement between the parties or was it simply part of an exchange which was subject to contract?