Issue 113 - November 2009
Was Sentosa entitled to stay, or order that it did not have to pay over monies awarded in an adjudication decision?
Issue 113 - November 2009
Was Sentosa entitled to stay, or order that it did not have to pay over monies awarded in an adjudication decision?
Issue 112 - October 2009
Could a sum awarded in a second adjudication be set off against the adjudicator’s award in the first adjudication?
Issue 111 - September 2009
Were Capital's withholding notices sufficient to comply with section 111 of the HGCRA?
Issue 111 - September 2009
Did the adjudicator have jurisdiction to consider a dispute where one party said there had been a novation?
Issue 107 - May 2009
Were the criticisms of the reasons given (or not given) by the adjudicator justified?
Links
[1] https://fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_113.pdf
[2] https://fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_112.pdf
[3] https://fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_111.pdf
[4] https://fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_107.pdf
[5] https://fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/adjudication?page=33