Issue 36 - June 2003
His Honour Judge Kirkham applied the principles of both Halki v Sopex and Sindall v Solland in deciding whether or not a dispute had arisen.
Issue 36 - June 2003
His Honour Judge Kirkham applied the principles of both Halki v Sopex and Sindall v Solland in deciding whether or not a dispute had arisen.
Issue 36 - June 2003
His Honour Judge Seymour QC had to consider whether there had been a breach of the principles of natural justice, where an adjudicator made his decision following consideration of a programming report which had not been sent to the parties but had been discussed at a meeting between the parties.
Issue 35 - May 2003
Mr Justice Forbes provides further guidance on the question of what constitutes a dispute.
Issue 32, February 2003
His Honour Judge Kirkham applied the Court of Appeal decision in RJT Consulting v DM Engineering in deciding whether an allegedly oral agreement fell within section 107 of the Housing Grants Construction & Regeneration Act.