Issue 92 - February 2008
Did the sub-contract contain a time bar in respect of the submission of the necessary documents for the sub-contractor's final account?
Issue 92 - February 2008
Did the sub-contract contain a time bar in respect of the submission of the necessary documents for the sub-contractor's final account?
Issue 91 - January 2008
Where there is true concurrency, is it ever appropriate to apportion responsibility for the delay between the two competing causes? See Issue 122 for the view of the Scottish Court of Appeal.
Issue 87 - September 2007
Were the costs recoverable under the collateral warranty Ltd to the costs of repair, renewal and/or reinstatement of any part or the works? Did liability extend to consequential losses?
Issue 87 - September 2007
Was Wittman entitled to recover amounts outstanding under a parent company guarantee?
Issue 84 - June 2007
Judge Toulmin CMG QC sets out some useful guidance for the use of critical path analysis on construction projects.
If you would like to receive a digital version of our newsletters please complete the subscription form.